Saltonstall Schedule Survives Despite Heated Debate
School Committee heatedly debates what programs work and how to get them in every school.
Before a rare packed house that remained until after 10 p.m., the School Committee voted five to two to allow the Saltonstall School to continue its popular, but controversial extended day and year programming for at least one more year.
Saltonstall, for much of its 17-year existence, has operated one hour longer each day and 10 days longer into the summer. The teachers are paid 16 percent more and do 22 percent more work, according to Saltonstall Principal Julie Carter.
Estimates were that Saltonstall's extended calendar costs the district an extra $100,000. That number, however, was challenged.
"The extended time makes a difference. It has a positive impact," Carter said.
The school committee agreed that extended time to learn was a laudable goal and as part of the compromise, offered by Committee Vice Chairman Jim Fleming, the committee voted to develop a plan to offer the extended summer enrichment programs at all schools, including Saltonstall.
Dr. Brendan Walsh, one of those opposing the compromise, said he did not believe the school district could afford to expand the after-school and summer enrichment programs that Saltonstall enjoys to all schools.
Dr. Janet Crane, who also voted against the compromise, said she wanted to end the Saltonstall extended calendar immediately. She said it was a question of treating all students equally.
Mayor Deplores Divisive Debate
Mayor Kimberley Driscoll, who disclosed that she is the parent of two Saltonstall students, backed the compromise on Saltonstall's schedule after two weeks of heated debate over the issue with critics saying Saltonstall gets a more enriched academic program than other schools do not get.
"We know we want more time on learning. We want to get everybody up to one more hour per day," she said.
The mayor, frustrated over the "divisiveness of the debate," conceded that the extended schedule at Saltonstall is more expensive. But the issues Salem faces will not be solved by money alone, she said.
"We are generous to our schools," she said. The per-pupil expenditures in Salem are far higher than in many similar cities, she said.
Improving education for all students will require more innovative programs, said Dr. Stephen Russell, the superintendent, after the meeting. He cited new research studies that suggest just extending the day for students does not improve learning.
The programs that were effective involved "hands-on experimental learning programs," he said. Many of those programs were offered by community partners, rather than the schools themselves.
Members of the public seemed almost evenly divided on the issue of Saltonstall's extended schedule.
Committee member Nate Bryant said, "It is clear that Saltonstall is succeeding." He said he was not sure if the success was the result of a higher socio-economic student population or the extended calendar. "I don't know the answer. Something is working," he said.
Walsh said he wanted to take the $100,000 for the extended calendar and apply it to other programs that cannot grow for lack of funds. He said underfunded early childhood developments programs would be a better use of the funds.
The debate continued so long that Bryant jokingly asked if the committee could send out for pizza.
Not a New Issue
Collins Middle School Principal Mary Manning said the Saltonstall extended calendar "is not a new issue." She said it has long been creating anger toward Saltonstall. "It has been festering behind the scenes for years," Manning said.
Some speakers called the $100,000 "a drop in the bucket" in a district that is proposing a budget next year of more than $50 million.
Manning said she would be happy to have $100,000 dropped in her school's budget. With that money she could hire more tutors that were dropped from the budget several years ago.
She said she had hoped that this was the year the extended day would be addressed by the school committee for all schools. "It has been a long time coming. It's time has come," she said.
Several speakers said they doubted that Saltonstall's $100,000, divided by nine schools, would accomplish much.
Arthur Sullivan asked, "If it is working, why take it away?" He and others joined in supporting extended calendars for all schools.
The mayor and several speakers worried that the issue is pitting one school against the others. Calling the debate on this issue "disheartening," the mayor said the issue had polarized the community.
"We need to be working together cooperatively," she said after the meeting.
Budget Hearing Set for June 4
The school committee has scheduled a public hearing on June 4 at City Hall on next year's budget.
The proposed budget would see an increase of 3.8 percent from $48,856,000 to $50,694,000.
Increases would come from adding assistant principals at the elementary schools, hiring a human resource director for the almost 1,000 employees of the district, hiring a lead nurse coordinator, hiring more teachers at the Bowditch, Witchcraft and Carlton schools and increasing the staff at the Parent Information Center.
The district plans to save some money on lower natural gas bills for the next three years and keeping more special education students at the district instead of sending them to more expensive out-of-district program. About 20 senior teachers are also expected to retire.
Rick Johnson
7:13 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
It was good to see so many turn out for last night's School Committee meeting, but I agree with Mayor Driscoll who said that we started this discussion the wrong way. We were led by Drs. Walsh and Crane into this polarizing debate with an unexpected amendment at the May 7 meeting. It is interesting that they both voted against the resolution presented by Mr. Fleming last night. I hope we can maintain Saltonstall's current calendar even after we extend academic solutions for the other schools. It is a program that balances the year by not only offering more learning time, but also by closing the long gap in learning over the traditional summer break in a thoughtful way that does not simply add 10 days to the end of a traditional school year. With any luck our good work in the turnaround effort will raise academic achievement for all without disrupting the existing programs that keep students and families engaged in our schools.
KlassySalem
10:02 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Rick for school committee!
michael beaulieu
6:51 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Why do we have live spanish translation for? I speak ?
christine
7:13 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Increases would come from adding assistant principals at the elementary schools. What does this mean ? Are they going to appoint an already existing employee to act as principle or are they creating a new job?
Lisa Lavoie
7:34 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
We are creating new assistant principal positions.
gene
7:41 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Create more administration and to the hell with the taxpayers. How does more overhead help in the academic growth in the students? IT DOESN'T!!!
Patti
7:54 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Gene, you are incorrect. The only way to effectively assess what is going on in the classroom and evaluate teachers is to add assistant principals. Most teachers in Salem are not really evaluated, and therefore, conclusions cannot be made regarding the effectiveness of instruction in the classroom. Real evaluations will help to uncover inconsistent teaching practices and get proper teacher training into the schools. Effective instruction is what will get us out of level 4.
KlassySalem
10:01 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Gene, read the DESE report. They disagree with you.
christine
7:15 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Patti I thought there is nothing you can do about bad teachers we usually hear the excuse our hands are tied they are protected by the union! :o
gene
9:04 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I guess I am a little skeptical since it was revealed a few years back that Usovicz and Levine were paying administrators mileage to drive to work and padding their contracts with other perks.
Josh Turiel
8:07 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I'll admit to having thought as Gene did that more administrators were a waste. Until I read the DESE report last year which was very clear in telling us that lack of oversight and management was one of the major issues here in the school system, and one of the root causes behind Salem's falling so far behind.
It's not just in-school instruction, even though that's the single most important thing. You need to manage the school as a whole, and teachers need administration to help with that and to properly evaluate the teachers' ability.
We have some really good teachers in the Salem schools, at Saltonstall and at the other schools, too. We also have some very strong principals and some lousy ones. We need the oversight to find and reward the good ones and clear out the bad ones. There's a lot of rebuilding to do.
Cindy Johnson
8:17 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
It is clear that Bentley needed more administrators. No one managed the former principal of Bentley, who managed to make a mess of the school in her brief time there. Despite raising red flags to the former superintendent and many others, nothing was done to improve the situation and it was ignored. The level 4 status by the state should not be a surprise to the committee. Many of them should apologize for their negligence. Hopefully, many of them will not be re-elected next time around, especially those who are set out to divide the families in our community.
KlassySalem
10:02 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I was pretty impressed with the new Bentley principal last night. Wish I could say the same for the middle school. I've never seen so much loathing from an "educator."
Cindy Johnson
11:15 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The new Bentley principal is wonderful. She will play a big part in turning that school around just as the former principal, Nancy Pelletier, played a major role in its downfall. Every day I drop off my child at that school, I run into Dr. McFarland. The kids are truly connected to her and find her very approachable judging by the way they run up to her to share news. Manning reminds me of Pelletier.
Cindy Johnson
8:38 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Saltonstall does not offer an after school program or summer enrichment. What we offer is a balanced schedule. We spread out the traditional calendar year to reduce retention loss over long summer breaks--something that happens with a traditional agricultural-based calendar. If the school committee is going to extend our program among other schools, I sincerely hope they replicate our model instead of offering a lackluster imitation. In the future, I hope Crane and Walsh follow meeting protocol and refrain from pitting one school against another, duping people like Manning into believing she needs to target her anger at Salts to improve Collins. This behavior is unacceptable from school administrators. It’s time Salem stops running mediocre schools. Salts and the Charter school are attractive options to engaged parents for a reason. Business as usual got us into this mess. It will not get us out.
KlassySalem
10:04 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
You forgot lecturing the audience and calling us stupid. That's a Walsh special.
DBL
8:51 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
While assistant principals are "nice" I believe the school department needs more cirriculum administrators who develop evidence based, effective programming across all the schools and have the authority and leverage to hold the schools/teachers accountable for implementation and follow through. Having assistant principals at each school again leaves the school to interpret the cirriculum and do what they "think works best" for their school. These administrators should be outside the union umbrella and have the responsibility to evaluate how effective teachers are at teaching the approved cirriculum.
KlassySalem
10:08 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
There was some good news shared last night. The Destination ImagiNation team from Horace Mann will be competing in the global finals in TN.
http://hmls2012di.com/
Chris
10:14 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I don't see why these things can't be discussed, the Mayor is playing pure politics and trying to stifle debate by calling it 'divisive'.
As for conflict of interest, I don't care what the Mayors lawyers said, she should have either not participated in the debate, or not participated in the vote. I guess as Queen she can have her cake and eat it.
Regarding the extra $100,000 a year that it costs to run the Saltonstall, where did that figure come from? Back in 2007 the Supt said it cost $251,000 extra for salaries alone:
http://www.salemnews.com/local/x1446648447/First-eighth-graders-move-on-at-Saltonstall
KlassySalem
10:17 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The vast majority of the extra salary goes to the extended day, which wasn't being debated.
It's important to note that several other schools spend more per pupil than Saltonstall, even with the extended day/year in place.
Patti
11:01 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Klassy, this is exactly why you cannot use per pupil spending as a measuring stick in making this decision. Salts has very few special needs students, compared to a school like Bates. The whole argument should have been framed better: this is a debate about 2 extra weeks of school (if in fact all other schools extend their day by an hour, as has been alluded to but not yet budgeted). It's really not worth all this fighting. Salem voters need to remember this when Mr. Walsh runs for school committee again.
Cindy Johnson
11:22 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
It's telling how those who want to do away with the Salts calendar lower themselves to name calling and stand on the soap boxes that Crane and Walsh built for them. Pretty proud of the Salts community and the way they have advocated for their school using data despite the low ball moves from people like Crane, Walsh, and Manning, who look to divide the city by preaching what they call "equality."
Cindy Johnson
11:24 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
@Patti Salts has 20.7% SPED and Bates has 23.5%. Pretty close.
Patti
12:23 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Cindy, I think if you look at the SPED population, you will find a vastly different type of student. I don't wish to bring SPED into the discussion as a tool, but the populations require completely different services. All I am saying is that per pupil spending is not the right argument to use.
David Pelletier
10:24 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Yawn!
Jared Robinson
11:24 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
We need MORE Saltonstalls, not less.
Emulate your successful school.
DBL
11:47 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The bottom line is comparing Salts and Witchcraft to other schools in the district is comparing apples to oranges. The student populations are vastly different. For all those saying that the Saltonstall program is effective I challenge you to get the same results from the student population at the Bowditch. Then and only then can you state with certainty that your program is better for the children of Salem. Once the schools are socioeconomically balanced and Saltonstall is still a well performing school then by all means advocate to keep your program. On the same token once the schools are balanced if Saltonstall performance declines then be open to other options which benefit all the children of Salem.
Cindy Johnson
12:10 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The Saltonstall population is there because parents made a choice and filled out their paperwork. If the administration had enforced school choice policies and if all parents had participated in the process, then perhaps our school would be more socioeconomically diverse. Hopefully, all parents will complete paperwork under the new school choice policy. It shouldn't be too much to ask parents to participate in their child's school selection process. Reminds of the saying "if you don't vote, then you have no right to complain."
Denise
9:40 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
" I challenge you to get the same results from the student population at the Bowditch."
Doesn't look like they will get the chance. The Saltonstall program will be changed before they can get the lower income kids in to see if it works for them.
Bill
12:12 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I just think Saltonstall is fun to say
DBL
12:32 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Right and those who fill out the paperwork, do everything they are supposed to and don't get in because the school only takes 100 kids and you happen to be 101 how is that fair??? It doesn't mean those parents are any less engaged and invested in their child's education. The demand should be filled for all not some. My child's education should not be based on the luck of the draw.
Cindy Johnson
1:24 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I was referring to those who don't fill out any paperwork. They get placed where the district places them, thus the lack of diversity at certain schools. I am no stranger to school wait lists, so I can certainly empathize with you. The way the city fills the spots is very ambiguous for parents, and, apparently, they weren't even following their policies regarding student assignment and prioritization based on location, race, etc.
Gabriel Roses
12:44 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Cindy and Patti. This is the first article, and comment string, I've read regarding education in Salem. I do think the SPED issue is worth looking into, but not for the reasons you mention. The national average is 13.1% (higher in MA, probably due to availability of testing). I have no idea why Salem would be in the 20-23% range...
KlassySalem
1:31 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Must be the power plant!
KlassySalem
1:49 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Seriously though, I wrote about our higher than average special ed population back in August.
http://keepitklassysalem.blogspot.com/2011/08/salem-has-special-ed-problem.html
Gabriel Roses
2:25 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Thank you for the link...
Cindy Johnson
2:32 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Klassy's take that schools weren't on the same page regarding offering IEPs seems likely. In 2006, we were given an IEP before our son was diagnosed with autism, so maybe others who never received a diagnosis were, too. The early intervention helped our son, but as the years went on, the SPED department has refused necessary services. Not sure where they are spending the money.
Gabriel Roses
3:43 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Absolutely. Mass over-identifies, and Salem is at the high end in an extreme state. Are they/we doing anything to begin to adjust the curve? (I work with students with disabilities in higher ed., not at this level).
lea benson
1:40 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
I hope the new assistant principals will not be offered sabbaticals and 3/4 of their salary so they can go get their doctorates on our dime like the others. Salem was just a career stepping stone for them.
john
1:50 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
As usual,the mayor uses her own frustration to try and get what she wants.She is the one that was thanking Cameron for the great work he did before leaving so her frustration is obviously due to her poor decisions on Salem schools that have led us to where we are today.She is not the voice of reason on schools.
KlassySalem
1:55 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
John, enlighten us. Who is the voice of reason on schools? I seem to recall the entire committee pumping Cameron's tires as he was retreating.
john
4:02 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
You should pay attention,the vioce of reason is the State Department of Education who took control of our troubled schools because the administration failed miserably.If the commitee were all misled then someone is has to be accountable.It was the State the said it was the administration and the Mayor runs the school commitee with an iron fist.It's not rocket science!!
Elizabeth Mizioch-Crawford
2:59 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
My child has been at Saltonstall for all her K-8 years and I would like to say thank you for the opportunity. The extended day/year has worked wonderfully for us. We have had wonderful teachers over those years. Parent involvment is a key to any schools success. I have spent time in the classroom, time on extra activites, fund raising, beautification projects, chaperoned and tutored. I have helped with buying supplies, financially supporting programs/trips and offered transportation. The school can only be as good as what you put into it, how much support you provide and a personal committment to ensure that your child is learning. Even with an extended day/year we dont just shut of learning in the home. We have carried class lessons into weekend, on vacations and spend several hours each night completing homework. Even if all the schools follow suit with the calender of Salts, it will take parental/caregiver/community support to make sure the children succeed.
Jack Carver
6:22 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The longer school year or the extra $100k is not why the students do better, The parents who want something better for their children and show interest in there school is why they do better, After all the salts really doesn't have that much of a longer school year when you factor in the all the Play day Fridays and extra vacation the Salts students get. I tell you this I wish we had more Principals like Mary Manning.
I heard an idea about taking over Saint Joes and reopening the school and calling it the point school. Turning the Church into the an Auditorium.
kimberly phifer
12:09 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
i am so glad i took my daughter out of public school and put her in the charter at least i dont have to worry about this stuff
christine
7:30 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
jOSH WRITES We have some really good teachers in the Salem schools, at Saltonstall and at the other schools, too. We also have some very strong principals and some lousy ones. We need the oversight to find and reward the good ones and clear out the bad ones. There's a lot of rebuilding to do.
By your own admission we have identified some lousey ones but we still need to clear them out, WE CAN"T and you know the excuses they have a contract or they are protected by the union... We don't need assistant priciples to identify this the childrens test scores tell us this...
KlassySalem
8:10 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Lousy principals don't have union protection. Clean them out.
Teachers, well that's another story.
christine
8:19 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Lousy principals have contracts!
Tommy
10:04 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Congratulations to Dr. Walsh, Dr. Crane and Principal Manning for their courage advocating for equality in public education for all Salem students. Public schools have a fiduciary responsibility, duty and mandate to do what is in the best interest of all students, not the chosen few. These educational leaders have demonstrated tenacious fortitude and dogged determination in the wake of extreme pressure from an active, vocal special interest group to articulate their positions. Thank you!
Rick Johnson
11:28 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
It is nice that you want an equitable education for all Salem students, but I don’t know whether this is realistic. No two Salem schools are exactly alike. They have various and differing programs, and each program has a cost. For instance, we hear about efforts to extend the school day at Bentley and Carlton. That might not seem fair to some in the other schools, but it is impractical to attempt this effort at all of the schools simultaneously. If we see value in increasing our students’ learning time, it makes sense to extend these services to all schools over time, including bridging the learning gap over the summer break. Reducing the learning time at a school that already has these services does little to improve our other schools and, in fact, could set us back since we have not analyzed the effects of this unplanned reduction. The committee made the right move in setting an ambitious goal for our district to extend the learning time for all of our students. As for your praise of Drs. Walsh and Crane, as I’ve made known on this website, they should have approached this conversation in a much more transparent and inclusive way. Their messages and actions call their intentions into question and set the tone for a polarizing debate. Our school officials should be doing all they can to bring our community together to work toward the shared goal of developing a culture of academic excellence. I sincerely hope we move in this direction from here on out.
SalemMom
11:51 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
As a parent who has 2 kids on the waiting list for the Salts, I would gladly pay the difference to have my kids get the extra time and education at school. Divide up the $100K per student and bill the parents. I wouldn't want to see a good school / program be gone over $30/month per student (or whatever the figure). Give the parents the option... I'm in!
Tommy
12:13 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The Saltonstall Program is no longer an experiment. It has been in existence for well over a decade. It either works or it doesn’t. If it works (test scores etc.) and there is a demand (waiting list etc.), the program should be replicated for all Salem students.
ds
1:20 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I think that it is more the motivation of the parents at Salts that make the true difference. I believe my daughter would strive in any school in Salem because of my active parenting. I read to her every night, take time on the weekends to seek educational opportunities, etc. I choose Salts because I went to the Magnet Program (another innovative school which is now the Pheonix School) in Salem and Salts aligned with that method of teaching and because it was in my district. My older daughter goes to the high school and is top of her class because I always make sure that she does her work and goes to school. I am switching her to a private school because Salem High is just not challenging enough for her. So, I will now spend $32,000/yr. Now, that is quality education! So parents, spend time with your kids, get involved and you too can have a smart kid! Learning starts at home. We cannot rely on teachers to solely teach our children. Children need reinforcement to what the teacher teaches in the classroom. Find out what is being taught and do the work at home too. And yes, I work full-time and have many other responsibilities but none as important as helping to educate my child!
And if you don't like the school that your child is currently in let the officials know. Come out to elections and vote for your school committee. There is a lot more you could be doing, don't deny it.
ds
1:21 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The Salts is successful because of so much more than extended day/extended year. I mean we are really fighting over 10 days!! What about their educational philosophy, dedicated parents and teachers, multi-age classrooms, etc. Trust me, you could take away the 10 days and the school would still out-perform the others. Then what would people have to say? This is just an excuse by the school board to side track us from the real issues. If the Salts and Charter school are working why don't we incorporate all the other things they do that don't cost money and see what happens. I bet there would be an increase in scores all around. But lets just focus on the $100,000 so that we don't have to do all the other REAL work that is involved in turning the schools around.
Erica
1:46 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I'm new to this topic and conversation so this may be a silly question; is it possible to have assistant principles be a shared resource across the schools? In addition to saving money, maybe this could inspire the sharing of ideas, successes, and more of a team environment across the schools.
Ed Payne
9:22 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
We have a child in Salts K which happens to be in Bently this year. From my non-academic perspective, I believe the kids at Bently would benefit from a longer school day. Much to some board members' chagrin, a recent Ford Foundation study reports longer school days improve children's academic performance. We decided that the short school day is not enough learning time for our daughter, so we have a tutor work with our child twice a week. When she is not working with her, she works with us on math and reading. Since we started this in November, it has proven very effective in increasing her reading ability and math skills. As I wrote earlier, I think the kids at Bently would be better prepared if they spent more time in the classroom.
I see the two board members attempts to achieve fairness (whatever that means) as more of an attempt to bring down a program that work and is the choice of most involved parents (what other school as a waiting list?). Maybe if another school mirrored a school that worked (Salts) we'd see more progress. If there was a shortage of students for Salts, I would say change it. But clearly the public wants this or there would not be a waiting list.
Pam Ryan
10:14 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
As a taxpayer and parent, my request to this and future administrations is this, please fund ONE model. Salem is having this divisive conversation because we are not discussing ONE model. We are discussing many different ideas that may or may not work through out the district. Testing results, whether you like them or not, do NOT show Salts as the model to emulate. There is a model that is working, Witchcraft. The school with the highest test of late comes at a smaller price tag. ANY additional money spent, be it per pupil or per school, is not fiscally responsible. That being said, there are programs at every school that are working without additional cost. All I ask is simple, find what is working and put it in play across the board. Unfortunately there is a school who is out performing Salts without the additional price tag. They are doing a lot of things better without the 10 extra days and extra hour a day. This is not divisive, it is fact. Take what is working and spread only ONE model across the district. Please stop being fiscally irresponsible with much needed education money.